Chemical Bank v. Demetrakis

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Chemical Bank v. Demetrakis

184 A.D.2d 234

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 4, 1992

StatusPublished

This text of 184 A.D.2d 234 (Chemical Bank v. Demetrakis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Chemical Bank v. Demetrakis, 184 A.D.2d 234 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1992).

Pincite

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Shirley Fingerhood, J.), entered April 2, 1991, which granted plain[235]*235tiff’s motion for summary judgment in lieu of complaint, and the judgment of the same court entered April 5, 1991 pursuant thereto, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Shirley Finger-hood, J.), entered May 22, 1991, which granted plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment in lieu of complaint, and the judgment of the same court entered May 22, 1991 pursuant thereto, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Shirley Finger-hood, J.), entered May 17, 1991, which granted plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment in lieu of complaint, and the judgment of the same court entered May 30, 1991 pursuant thereto, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

The IAS court properly granted these motions pursuant to CPLR 3213, defendant having failed to satisfy his obligations under the unambiguous instruments in question or raise any meritorious defenses to plaintiff’s claims. Concur — Carro, J. P., Rosenberger, Kupferman, Kassal and Smith, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Shirley Fingerhood, J.), entered April 2, 1991, which granted plain[235]*235tiff’s motion for summary judgment in lieu of complaint, and the judgment of the same court entered April 5, 1991 pursuant thereto, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Shirley Finger-hood, J.), entered May 22, 1991, which granted plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment in lieu of complaint, and the judgment of the same court entered May 22, 1991 pursuant thereto, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Shirley Finger-hood, J.), entered May 17, 1991, which granted plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment in lieu of complaint, and the judgment of the same court entered May 30, 1991 pursuant thereto, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

The IAS court properly granted these motions pursuant to CPLR 3213, defendant having failed to satisfy his obligations under the unambiguous instruments in question or raise any meritorious defenses to plaintiff’s claims. Concur — Carro, J. P., Rosenberger, Kupferman, Kassal and Smith, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

184 A.D.2d 234, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chemical-bank-v-demetrakis-nyappdiv-1992.