Chemical Bank v. Commercial Industries Service Co.

668 S.W.2d 336, 27 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 350, 1984 Tex. LEXIS 341
Texas Supreme Court·Decided April 25, 1984·No. No. C-2785·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Chemical Bank sued Commercial Industries for breach of an equipment lease agreement, alleging that it had failed to tender monthly payments. Chemical Bank attempted to°introduce its business records with an affidavit by the custodian of the records to prove its cause of action, but the trial court sustained an objection that they were inadmissible because they had not been filed with the court fourteen days before the commencement of trial as required by TEX.REV.CIV.STAT.ANN. art. S737e § 5. The court of appeals affirmed the judgment. 662 S.W.2d 802.

We refuse the application for writ of error, no reversible error, but point out that the court of appeals holding concerning mandatory compliance with the fourteen day rule is only applicable to cases in which a party introduces an affidavit from the custodian of the records in lieu of calling the custodian to testify. If the custodian or other qualified person had been called to testify in person concerning Chemical Bank’s business records, it would not have been a valid objection that the records had not been filed with the court fourteen days prior to trial.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Chemical Bank v. Commercial Industries Service Co., 668 S.W.2d 336, 27 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 350, 1984 Tex. LEXIS 341 (Tex. 1984).

668 S.W.2d 336 (Chemical Bank v. Commercial Industries Service Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Brooks v. Housing Authority of the City of El Paso
926 S.W.2d 316 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1996)
Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion
Texas Attorney General Reports, 1987
Opinion No.
Texas Attorney General Reports, 1987
Cook v. State
720 S.W.2d 867 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1986)
Ayre v. Brown & Root, Inc.
678 S.W.2d 564 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1984)