Chemical Bank v. Belk
259 S.E.2d 911
This text of 259 S.E.2d 911 (Chemical Bank v. Belk) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Chemical Bank v. Belk, 259 S.E.2d 911 (N.C. 1979).
Opinion
CHEMICAL BANK
v.
Henderson BELK.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Grier, Parker, Poe, Thompson, Bernstein, Gage & Preston, for plaintiff.
Weinstein, Sturges, Odom, Bigger, Jonas & Campbell, for defendant.
Petition by plaintiff for discretionary review under G.S. § 7A-31, 41 N.C.App. 356, 255 S.E.2d 421. Denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Chemical Bank v. Belk
255 S.E.2d 421 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1979)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
259 S.E.2d 911, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chemical-bank-v-belk-nc-1979.