Chemical Bank & Trust Co. v. Silverman

37 A.D.2d 837, 325 N.Y.S.2d 1008, 1971 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3364

This text of 37 A.D.2d 837 (Chemical Bank & Trust Co. v. Silverman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Chemical Bank & Trust Co. v. Silverman, 37 A.D.2d 837, 325 N.Y.S.2d 1008, 1971 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3364 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1971).

Opinion

In an action to recover the balance owing upon a promissory note, defendant appeals from (1) an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, entered January 5, 1971, which granted plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment' pursuant to CPLR 3213, and (2) a judgment of the same court entered January 8, 1971 upon said order. Order and judgment affirmed, with one bill of $10 costs and disbursements. Defendant’s argument about failure of Special Term to direct an assignment to him of the collateral, given on the promissory note in suit, is premature. Hopkins, Acting P. J., Shapiro, Gulotta, Christ and Benjamin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
37 A.D.2d 837, 325 N.Y.S.2d 1008, 1971 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3364, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chemical-bank-trust-co-v-silverman-nyappdiv-1971.