Cheltenham & Abington Sewerage Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission

Supreme Court

Cheltenham & Abington Sewerage Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission

331 U.S. 784, 67 S. Ct. 1205

Supreme Court of the United States·Decided April 28, 1947·No. No. 1223; No. 1230·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The motions to dismiss are granted and the appeals are dismissed. Treating the papers whereon the appeals were allowed as petitions for writs of certiorari as required by § 237 (c) of the Judicial Code, as amended, 28 U. S. C. § 344 (c), certiorari is denied. George Henry Hujt for appellant in No. 1223. Max P. Zall for appellant in No. 1230. Charles E. Thomas, Samuel Graff Miller and William McKelvy Rutter for appellee in No. 1223. Henry E. Lutz for appellees in No. 1230. Reported below: No. 1223, 355 Pa. 377, 49 A. 2d 707; No. 1230, 115 Colo. 510, 176 P. 2d 904.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

The motions to dismiss are granted and the appeals are dismissed. Treating the papers whereon the appeals were allowed as petitions for writs of certiorari as required by § 237 (c) of the Judicial Code, as amended, 28 U. S. C. § 344 (c), certiorari is denied. George Henry Hujt for appellant in No. 1223. Max P. Zall for appellant in No. 1230. Charles E. Thomas, Samuel Graff Miller and William McKelvy Rutter for appellee in No. 1223. Henry E. Lutz for appellees in No. 1230. Reported below: No. 1223, 355 Pa. 377, 49 A. 2d 707; No. 1230, 115 Colo. 510, 176 P. 2d 904.

Cheltenham & Abington Sewerage Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission, 331 U.S. 784, 67 S. Ct. 1205 (1947).

Pincite

331 U.S. 784 (Cheltenham & Abington Sewerage Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related