Cheltenham & Abington Sewerage Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission
This text of 331 U.S. 784 (Cheltenham & Abington Sewerage Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The motions to dismiss are granted and the appeals are dismissed. Treating the papers whereon the appeals were allowed as petitions for writs of certiorari as required by § 237 (c) of the Judicial Code, as amended, 28 U. S. C. § 344 (c), certiorari is denied. George Henry Hujt for appellant in No. 1223. Max P. Zall for appellant in No. 1230. Charles E. Thomas, Samuel Graff Miller and William McKelvy Rutter for appellee in No. 1223. Henry E. Lutz for appellees in No. 1230. Reported below: No. 1223, 355 Pa. 377, 49 A. 2d 707; No. 1230, 115 Colo. 510, 176 P. 2d 904.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
331 U.S. 784, 67 S. Ct. 1205, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cheltenham-abington-sewerage-co-v-pennsylvania-public-utility-scotus-1947.