Home/Supreme Court/Cheltenham & Abington Sewerage Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission

Cheltenham & Abington Sewerage Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission

317 U.S. 588, 63 S. Ct. 39
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedOctober 12, 1942
DocketNo. 160; No. 169
StatusPublished

This text of 317 U.S. 588 (Cheltenham & Abington Sewerage Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cheltenham & Abington Sewerage Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission, 317 U.S. 588, 63 S. Ct. 39 (1942).

Opinion

Per Curiam:

In No. 160 the appeal is dismissed, and in No. 169 the petition for writ of [589]*589certiorari is denied, for want of a final judgment. Grays Harbor Logging Co. v. Coats-Fordney Co., 243 U. S. 251; Wick v. Superior Court, 278 U. S. 575.

Mr. George Henry Huft for appellant in No. 160 and respondent in No. 169. Mr. Thomas A. Foulke for Benjamin H. Davis et al., appellees in No. 160. Messrs. Claude T. Reno, Harry M. Showalter, Samuel Graff Miller, and Herbert S. Levy for the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Grays Harbor Logging Co. v. Coats-Fordney Logging Co.
243 U.S. 251 (Supreme Court, 1917)
Wick v. Superior Court
278 U.S. 575 (Supreme Court, 1928)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
317 U.S. 588, 63 S. Ct. 39, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cheltenham-abington-sewerage-co-v-pennsylvania-public-utility-scotus-1942.