Chelsie Barker v. Hutzel Women's Hospital

CourtMichigan Supreme Court
DecidedMay 13, 2016
Docket153377
StatusPublished

This text of Chelsie Barker v. Hutzel Women's Hospital (Chelsie Barker v. Hutzel Women's Hospital) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Chelsie Barker v. Hutzel Women's Hospital, (Mich. 2016).

Opinion

Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

May 13, 2016 Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman Brian K. Zahra 153377(148) Bridget M. McCormack David F. Viviano Richard H. Bernstein CHELSIE BARKER, a Minor, by her Conservator Joan L. Larsen, HOWARD LINDEN, Justices Plaintiff-Appellant, SC: 153377 v COA: 321857 Wayne CC: 07-729813-NH HUTZEL WOMEN’S HOSPITAL, Defendant-Appellee, and DETROIT MEDICAL CENTER/WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY, Defendant. _________________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion of defendant-appellee to extend the time for filing its answer to the application for leave to appeal is GRANTED. The answer submitted on May 6, 2016, is accepted for filing.

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. May 13, 2016 Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Chelsie Barker v. Hutzel Women's Hospital, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chelsie-barker-v-hutzel-womens-hospital-mich-2016.