Chelsea/22 Associates v. Fleissner

150 A.D.2d 212, 540 N.Y.S.2d 815, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6191
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMay 11, 1989
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 150 A.D.2d 212 (Chelsea/22 Associates v. Fleissner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Chelsea/22 Associates v. Fleissner, 150 A.D.2d 212, 540 N.Y.S.2d 815, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6191 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1989).

Opinion

Order and judgment (one paper) of the Supreme Court, New York County (Shirley Fingerhood, J.), entered on March 24, 1988, which converted defendants’ motion to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a cause of action into one for summary judgment and granted summary judgment to defendants dismissing the complaint and denied counsel fees to defendants, is unanimously modified on the law to the extent of granting counsel fees to defendants, remanding the matter for an assessment of attorneys’ fees and otherwise affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Pursuant to paragraph 4 (b) of the mortgage extension agreement herein, plaintiff obligated itself to pay "all reasonable attorneys fees, costs and disbursements incurred or owed by Mortgagee in respect of anything related to or arising out of this Mortgage and/or Mortgage Note and Agreement before or after the Extended Due Date.” Since the instant litigation was clearly "in respect of anything related to or arising out of’ the mortgage and mortgage extension agreement, defendants are entitled to reasonable counsel fees. Concur—Sullivan, J. P., Asch, Milonas, Rosenberger and Wallach, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Vacation Village Homeowners' Ass'n v. Mordkofsky
254 A.D.2d 650 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)
Chiu v. Hoydal
248 A.D.2d 426 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)
Sirota v. Langtry
227 A.D.2d 955 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
150 A.D.2d 212, 540 N.Y.S.2d 815, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6191, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chelsea22-associates-v-fleissner-nyappdiv-1989.