Chelsea Land & Improvement Co. v. Adams

66 A. 180, 71 N.J. Eq. 771, 1 Buchanan 771, 1907 N.J. LEXIS 289
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided February 2, 1907·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion delivered in the court of chancery by Vice-Chancellor Bergen.

For affirmance—The Chiee-Justice, Garrison, Fort, Hendrickson, Bogert, Vredenburgh, Vroom, Green, Gray, Dill —10. For reversal—Swayze, Reed, Trenchard—3.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Chelsea Land & Improvement Co. v. Adams, 66 A. 180, 71 N.J. Eq. 771, 1 Buchanan 771, 1907 N.J. LEXIS 289 (N.J. 1907).

66 A. 180 (Chelsea Land & Improvement Co. v. Adams) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Schlichting v. Winter
83 A.2d 807 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1951)
Casriel v. King
58 A.2d 269 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1948)
Pennsylvania Rd. v. Robinson-Ransbottom Pottery Co.
174 N.E. 2 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1930)
Rogers v. Zwolak
110 A. 674 (Court of Chancery of Delaware, 1920)