Chelsea Land & Improvement Co. v. Adams

66 A. 180, 71 N.J. Eq. 771, 1 Buchanan 771, 1907 N.J. LEXIS 289
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedFebruary 2, 1907
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 66 A. 180 (Chelsea Land & Improvement Co. v. Adams) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Chelsea Land & Improvement Co. v. Adams, 66 A. 180, 71 N.J. Eq. 771, 1 Buchanan 771, 1907 N.J. LEXIS 289 (N.J. 1907).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion delivered in the court of chancery by Vice-Chancellor Bergen.

For affirmance—The Chiee-Justice, Garrison, Fort, Hendrickson, Bogert, Vredenburgh, Vroom, Green, Gray, Dill —10. For reversal—Swayze, Reed, Trenchard—3.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Schlichting v. Winter
83 A.2d 807 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1951)
Casriel v. King
58 A.2d 269 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1948)
Pennsylvania Rd. v. Robinson-Ransbottom Pottery Co.
174 N.E. 2 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1930)
Rogers v. Zwolak
110 A. 674 (Court of Chancery of Delaware, 1920)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
66 A. 180, 71 N.J. Eq. 771, 1 Buchanan 771, 1907 N.J. LEXIS 289, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chelsea-land-improvement-co-v-adams-nj-1907.