Chekiang Co. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Chekiang Co. v. United States

41 Cust. Ct. 407

CourtUnited States Customs Court

DecidedNovember 24, 1958

DocketNo. 62460; protests 291973-K, etc. (New York)

StatusPublished

This text of 41 Cust. Ct. 407 (Chekiang Co. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Chekiang Co. v. United States, 41 Cust. Ct. 407 (cusc 1958).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of iron pictures the same in all material respects as those the subject of Marshall Field & Co. v. United States (45 C. C. P. A. 72, C. A. D. 676), the claim at 22}í percent under the provision in paragraph 397, as modified by the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (T. D. 51802), for articles or wares in chief value of base metal, not specially provided for, was sustained. The merchandise under protest 326777-K, which was entered on or after June 30, 1956, was held dutiable at 21 percent under said paragraph, as modified by the Sixth Protocol to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (T. D. 54108).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of iron pictures the same in all material respects as those the subject of Marshall Field & Co. v. United States (45 C. C. P. A. 72, C. A. D. 676), the claim at 22}í percent under the provision in paragraph 397, as modified by the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (T. D. 51802), for articles or wares in chief value of base metal, not specially provided for, was sustained. The merchandise under protest 326777-K, which was entered on or after June 30, 1956, was held dutiable at 21 percent under said paragraph, as modified by the Sixth Protocol to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (T. D. 54108).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

41 Cust. Ct. 407, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chekiang-co-v-united-states-cusc-1958.