Cheffey v. Cheffey

821 S.W.2d 124, 1991 Mo. App. LEXIS 1931, 1991 WL 276714
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided December 31, 1991·No. No. 17315·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant Richard Cheffey seeks to appeal from a judgment entered by the trial court on November 6, 1990. Respondent has filed a meritorious motion to dismiss the appeal. The judgment was entered pursuant to the agreement of the parties. This appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

A judgment entered pursuant to an agreement of the parties is not a judicial determination of rights and cannot be appealed. Shafer v. Auto. Club Inter-Ins. Exchange, 778 S.W.2d 395, 400[5] (Mo.App.1989); Roberts v. Roberts, 515 S.W.2d 805, 806[2] (Mo.App.1974); State ex rel. Fletcher v. New Amsterdam Cos. Co., 430 S.W.2d 642, 645[7,8] (Mo.App.1968); Foger v. Johnson, 362 S.W.2d 763, 764-765[2] (Mo.App.1962). A party is estopped or waives his right to appeal when a judgment is entered at his request. State ex rel. Fletcher v. New Amsterdam Cas. Co., supra, at 645.

Appeal dismissed.

All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cheffey v. Cheffey, 821 S.W.2d 124, 1991 Mo. App. LEXIS 1931, 1991 WL 276714 (Mo. Ct. App. 1991).

821 S.W.2d 124 (Cheffey v. Cheffey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Echessa v. Echessa
74 S.W.3d 802 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2002)
Segar v. Segar
50 S.W.3d 844 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2001)
Newton County Juvenile Officer v. E.H.
963 S.W.2d 374 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1998)
In Interest of AH
963 S.W.2d 374 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1998)
Cook v. Jones
887 S.W.2d 740 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1994)
Hudson v. Hudson
865 S.W.2d 405 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1993)
Stewart v. Stewart
866 S.W.2d 154 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1993)