Cheff v. Bank of the Commonwealth
This text of 198 N.W.2d 914 (Cheff v. Bank of the Commonwealth) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Memorandum Opinion. The trial court granted defendant’s motion for summary judgment and plaintiffs appeal.
GCR 1963, 117.2(3) authorizes summary judgment when there is no genuine issue as to any material fact. Plaintiffs’ claim that their unrecorded mortgage was entitled to priority over defendant’s mortgage would be proved by a finding that defendant had actual knowledge of plaintiffs’ mortgage before defendant took its mortgage. The issue of defendant’s actual knowledge is disputed on this record and summary judgment was improper.
Reversed and remanded for trial with costs to plaintiffs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
198 N.W.2d 914, 40 Mich. App. 474, 1972 Mich. App. LEXIS 1155, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cheff-v-bank-of-the-commonwealth-michctapp-1972.