Cheeseman v. Shaw

133 So. 696, 222 Ala. 661, 1931 Ala. LEXIS 305
Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided March 19, 1931·No. 6 Div. 828.·Published

Opinion

BOULDIN, J.

The sole error insisted upon is the rendition of a judgment nil dicit without the intervention of a jury and writ of inquiry.

The action is upon promissory notes with claim for “reasonable attorney’s fees,” as stipulated in the notes.

A defendant must demand a jury trial within thirty days after the perfection of service on him. Code, §§ 8595, 9498. Unless filed within time, the right of trial by jury is waived.

The record shows complaint filed February 11th. It does not show the date service of summons was perfected on defendant. No demand for a jury was filed until August 9th. Error must affirmatively appear.

Affirmed.

ANDEESON, C. J., and GAEDNEE and FOSTEE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cheeseman v. Shaw, 133 So. 696, 222 Ala. 661, 1931 Ala. LEXIS 305 (Ala. 1931).

133 So. 696 (Cheeseman v. Shaw) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.