Cheek v. Wilson

7 Ind. 354
CourtIndiana Supreme Court
DecidedDecember 26, 1855
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 7 Ind. 354 (Cheek v. Wilson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cheek v. Wilson, 7 Ind. 354 (Ind. 1855).

Opinion

Perkins, J.—Suit

by Wilson, administrator of Damiel Lynn, deceased, against Elizabeth II. Cheek, formerly Elizabeth II. Lyrm, widow of said Daniel Lynn, deceased, on a promissory note. The surety on the note, and her now husband are sued jointly with her, but the fact is not material to be remembered. A denial of the complaint was put in. The following agreement of counsel presents the only question to be decided.

“ The parties agree that if the said Elizabeth H. Cheek, who was the widow of Dcmiel Lynn, senior, deceased, who made his last will and testament, by which he bequeathed certain personal property to the said Elizabeth II, which she has accepted and received, and also a life estate in said real estate described in said will, is entitled to have of said estate 150 dollars in money or property, then there shall be credit allowed on the note on which this suit was [355]*355brought of 150 dollars, and a judgment for the residue of said note, deducting the credits indorsed, against defendants. And it is further submitted to the Court to determine whether or not the property bequeathed to the said Elizabeth EL by the will, should be considered by the Court as a part of 150 dollars, or equal thereto in value.”

D. S. Major and A. Brower, for the appellants. J. T. Brown, for the appellee.

The statute which governs this case, E. S. 1843, p. 1049, gave to the widow 150 dollars out of her husband’s estate, for which she was not bound in any manner to account. We think the sum independent of dower, or bequests in a will. See Kellogg et al. v. Graves et al., 5 Ind. R. 509.

The Court below should have allowed the credit.

Per Curiam.

The judgment is reversed with costs. Cause remanded, with instructions to the Circuit Court to allow said credit.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ellis v. Ellis
96 S.W. 260 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1906)
Glenn v. Gunn
88 Mo. App. 423 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1901)
Whisnand v. Fee
52 N.E. 229 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1898)
Shipman v. Keys
26 N.E. 896 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1891)
Nelson v. Wilson
61 Ind. 255 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1878)
Loring v. Craft
16 Ind. 110 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1861)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
7 Ind. 354, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cheek-v-wilson-ind-1855.