Cheek v. State

81 S.E. 586, 14 Ga. App. 536, 1914 Ga. App. LEXIS 366
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedApril 30, 1914
Docket5573
StatusPublished

This text of 81 S.E. 586 (Cheek v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cheek v. State, 81 S.E. 586, 14 Ga. App. 536, 1914 Ga. App. LEXIS 366 (Ga. Ct. App. 1914).

Opinion

Roan, J.

1. There was no error in overruling the demurrer. If it was necessary to allege that the prosecutor sustained loss, this requirement was complied with by the allegation that he was “cheated and defrauded” in a named sum. The words “cheated and defrauded,” by necessary implication, assert loss.

2. The assignments of error as to the admission of certain testimony to which objection was made depend wholly upon the point raised by the demurrer, and are without merit.

3. The evidence authorized the verdict, and there was no error in refusing a new trial. Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
81 S.E. 586, 14 Ga. App. 536, 1914 Ga. App. LEXIS 366, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cheek-v-state-gactapp-1914.