Checksfield v. Berg

78 N.E.3d 1191, 29 N.Y.3d 1044, 56 N.Y.S.3d 505, 2017 NY Slip Op 78285, 2017 WL 2743283, 2017 N.Y. LEXIS 1716
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedJune 27, 2017
StatusPublished

This text of 78 N.E.3d 1191 (Checksfield v. Berg) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Checksfield v. Berg, 78 N.E.3d 1191, 29 N.Y.3d 1044, 56 N.Y.S.3d 505, 2017 NY Slip Op 78285, 2017 WL 2743283, 2017 N.Y. LEXIS 1716 (N.Y. 2017).

Opinion

On the Court’s own motion, appeal dismissed, without costs, upon the ground that no appeal lies as of right from the unanimous order of the Appellate Division absent the direct involvement of a substantial constitutional question (see CPLR 5601). Motion for leave to appeal denied.

Judge Feinman taking no part.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
78 N.E.3d 1191, 29 N.Y.3d 1044, 56 N.Y.S.3d 505, 2017 NY Slip Op 78285, 2017 WL 2743283, 2017 N.Y. LEXIS 1716, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/checksfield-v-berg-ny-2017.