Cheaves v. State

19 So. 3d 451, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 16072, 2009 WL 3446756
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedOctober 28, 2009
DocketNo. 2D09-78
StatusPublished

This text of 19 So. 3d 451 (Cheaves v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cheaves v. State, 19 So. 3d 451, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 16072, 2009 WL 3446756 (Fla. Ct. App. 2009).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We reverse and remand appellant’s sentence for rescoring with a corrected guidelines scoresheet because the violation of probation in case number 95-524F was not before the court for resentencing. See Cheaves v. State, 761 So.2d 1162 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000) (reciting the offenses in case number 95-3271F to be reconsidered for resentencing pursuant to Heggs v. State, 759 So.2d 620 (Fla.2000)). The court shall correct the scoresheet by deleting the point value from the “Release Program Violation” line. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.702(d)(1). The court shall forward the corrected scoresheet to the Department of Corrections.

Reversed and remanded, with instructions.

CASANUEVA, C.J., and SILBERMAN and LaROSE, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Heggs v. State
759 So. 2d 620 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2000)
Cheaves v. State
761 So. 2d 1162 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
19 So. 3d 451, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 16072, 2009 WL 3446756, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cheaves-v-state-fladistctapp-2009.