CHEATHAM v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
This text of CHEATHAM v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION (CHEATHAM v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
KAREEM A. CHEATHAM, : CIVIL ACTION : Plaintiff : : v. : : SOCIAL SECURITY : No. 21-cv-00741-RAL ADMINISTRATION , : : Defendant :
O R D E R AND NOW this 31st day of March, 2022, upon consideration of the parties’ submissions, it is ORDERED that: 1. The Commissioner’s motion to dismiss Plaintiff’s complaint (Doc. No. 21) is GRANTED; 2. JUDGMENT IS ENTERED by separate document, in favor of the Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Kilolo Kijakazi, filed contemporaneously. See Shalala v. Schaefer, 509 U.S. 292, 303 (1993); Kadelski v. Sullivan, 30 F.3d 399, 402 (3d Cir. 1994); Fed. R. Civ. P. 58(a); and 3. The Clerk of Court shall mark this case CLOSED for all purposes including statistics. BY THE COURT:
s/Richard A. Lloret________ RICHARD A. LLORET U.S. Magistrate Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
CHEATHAM v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cheatham-v-social-security-administration-paed-2022.