CHEATHAM v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania·Decided March 31, 2022·No. 2:21-cv-00741·Unknown

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

KAREEM A. CHEATHAM, : CIVIL ACTION : Plaintiff : : v. : : SOCIAL SECURITY : No. 21-cv-00741-RAL ADMINISTRATION , : : Defendant :

O R D E R AND NOW this 31st day of March, 2022, upon consideration of the parties’ submissions, it is ORDERED that: 1. The Commissioner’s motion to dismiss Plaintiff’s complaint (Doc. No. 21) is GRANTED; 2. JUDGMENT IS ENTERED by separate document, in favor of the Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Kilolo Kijakazi, filed contemporaneously. See Shalala v. Schaefer, 509 U.S. 292, 303 (1993); Kadelski v. Sullivan, 30 F.3d 399, 402 (3d Cir. 1994); Fed. R. Civ. P. 58(a); and 3. The Clerk of Court shall mark this case CLOSED for all purposes including statistics. BY THE COURT:

s/Richard A. Lloret________ RICHARD A. LLORET U.S. Magistrate Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

CHEATHAM v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, (E.D. Pa. 2022).

CHEATHAM v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION (CHEATHAM v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Shalala v. Schaefer
509 U.S. 292 (Supreme Court, 1993)