Cheatham v. Palmer

172 S.E. 462, 178 Ga. 223, 1934 Ga. LEXIS 19
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided January 16, 1934·No. No. 9839·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Gilbert, J.

The petition alleges that by mutual mistake of the parties a deed executed by petitioners to the defendant does not express the intention of the parties to the contract, and prays for reformation of the instrument. Such petition was not subject to a general demurrer. Civil Code (1910), § 4567, § 4578; Green v. Johnson, 153 Ga. 738 (4) (113 S. E. 402.)

Judgment affirmed.

Russell, G. J., Beeh, P. J., and Atlcinson and Bell, JJ., concur. Delete & Delete and Philip Weliner, for plaintiff in error. II. A. BoyTein, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cheatham v. Palmer, 172 S.E. 462, 178 Ga. 223, 1934 Ga. LEXIS 19 (Ga. 1934).

172 S.E. 462 (Cheatham v. Palmer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Mulkey v. Spicer
43 S.E.2d 661 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1947)
W. P. Brown & Sons Lumber Co. v. Echols
36 S.E.2d 762 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1946)
Cheatham v. Palmer
13 S.E.2d 674 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1941)