Cheatham v. Hill

29 Mo. 311
CourtSupreme Court of Missouri
DecidedJanuary 15, 1860
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 29 Mo. 311 (Cheatham v. Hill) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Missouri primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cheatham v. Hill, 29 Mo. 311 (Mo. 1860).

Opinion

Ewing, Judge,

deliveréd the opinion of the court.

The answer in this case contains no allegation of fraud; the defence it set up was inadmissible for the reasons given iri the opinion in the case of Ohrisman & Smart,' administrators of Smith, v. Thomas, decided at this term.

Judgment affirmed ;

the other judges concurring.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Holmes v. Farris
71 S.W. 116 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1902)
Jackson Bank v. Durfey
72 Miss. 971 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1895)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
29 Mo. 311, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cheatham-v-hill-mo-1860.