Cheatham v. Haley
This text of 1 Tenn. 265 (Cheatham v. Haley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Tennessee Superior Court for Law and Equity primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Action on the Case. — The defendant sold a negro slave to the plaintiff, and gave him a bill of sale warranting the title; but there was no warranty as to the health of the slave. It was proved that she was a fool, and that the defendant knew it before the sale. This testimony however was objected to on the ground of its being verbal, and would vary the written contract or bill of sale, and to support this objection were cited Esp. N. P. 96; 4 Rep. 81; 1 Com. Dig. 228; 1 Fonb. 365; Esp. N. P. 630; Doug. 20; 1 Fonb. 364. For the plaintiff, Taylor, 17; Esp. N. P. 632; Taylor, 1; 1 Hayw. 464; 3 Bac. Ab. 166. The evidence is admissible.
Verdict for plaintiff.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1 Tenn. 265, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cheatham-v-haley-tennsuperct-1808.