Cheatham v. Gormley

186 S.E. 736, 182 Ga. 649, 1936 Ga. LEXIS 527
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided July 10, 1936·No. No. 11060·Published

Opinion

Atkinson, Justice.

The State superintendent of banks, having in charge the affairs of insolvent banks for the purpose of liquidation, instituted suit against several officers and directors of a bank, serving at different times during a series of years, for damages on account of alleged acts of misfeasance and acts of nonfeasance, based on thirteen transactions, pausing loss to the creditors and stockholders of the bank. The prayers were for a money judgment and for an accounting. To the petition as amended general and special demurrers were filed. The judge sustained the demurrers to paragraphs which related to one of the transactions, and overruled all other demurrers. The defendants excepted. The case is one purely at law, in relation to a subject-matter of such character that the Supreme Court has not jurisdiction of the writ of error. The case is therefore transferred to the Court of Appeals which has jurisdiction. Mobley v. Shannon, 169 Ga. 876 (152 S. E. 255); Gormley v. Slicer, 178 Ga. 85 (172 S. E. 21); Dillon v. Sills, 181 Ga. 582 (183 S. E. 563).

Transferred to Court of Appeals.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cheatham v. Gormley, 186 S.E. 736, 182 Ga. 649, 1936 Ga. LEXIS 527 (Ga. 1936).

186 S.E. 736 (Cheatham v. Gormley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Mobley v. Shannon
152 S.E. 255 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1930)
Gormley v. Slicer
172 S.E. 21 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1933)
Dillon v. Sills
183 S.E. 563 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1936)