Cheatham v. Decker
752 So. 2d 657, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 349, 2000 WL 35860
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 19, 2000·No. No. 1D99-3731·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
Dismissed. Appellant argues his notice of appeal was timely filed because he timely filed a motion for rehearing. Appellant’s motion for rehearing was untimely filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.330(a). The burden is on the appellant to demonstrate that he timely filed the motion for rehearing under the “mail box rule,” as set forth in Haag v. State, 591 So.2d 614 (Fla.1992). Appellant has failed to sustain his burden. The instant appeal is therefore dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cheatham v. Decker, 752 So. 2d 657, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 349, 2000 WL 35860 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).
752 So. 2d 657 (Cheatham v. Decker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Cheatham v. Decker
751 So. 2d 176 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)