Home/Supreme Court/Cheatham Electric Switching Device Co. v. Transit Development Co.

Cheatham Electric Switching Device Co. v. Transit Development Co.

252 U.S. 567, 40 S. Ct. 343
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedMarch 8, 1920
DocketNo. 692
StatusPublished

This text of 252 U.S. 567 (Cheatham Electric Switching Device Co. v. Transit Development Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cheatham Electric Switching Device Co. v. Transit Development Co., 252 U.S. 567, 40 S. Ct. 343 (1920).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of Aspen Mining & Smelting Co. v. Billings, 150 U. S. 31, 37; Brown v. Alton Water Co., 222 U. S. 325, 332-334; Metropolitan Water Co. v. Kaw Valley District, 223 U. S. 519, 522; Shapiro v. United States, 235 U. S. 412, 416. And see Red Jacket, Jr., Coal Co. v. United Thacker Coal Co., 248 U. S. 531.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Aspen Mining & Smelting Co. v. Billings
150 U.S. 31 (Supreme Court, 1893)
Brown v. Alton Water Co.
222 U.S. 325 (Supreme Court, 1912)
Metropolitan Water Co. v. Kaw Valley Drainage District
223 U.S. 519 (Supreme Court, 1912)
Shapiro v. United States
235 U.S. 412 (Supreme Court, 1914)
Jacket v. United Thacker Coal Co.
248 U.S. 531 (Supreme Court, 1918)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
252 U.S. 567, 40 S. Ct. 343, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cheatham-electric-switching-device-co-v-transit-development-co-scotus-1920.