Cheatham Electric Switching Device Co. v. Transit Development Co.
252 U.S. 567, 40 S. Ct. 343
Opinion
Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of Aspen Mining & Smelting Co. v. Billings, 150 U. S. 31, 37; Brown v. Alton Water Co., 222 U. S. 325, 332-334; Metropolitan Water Co. v. Kaw Valley District, 223 U. S. 519, 522; Shapiro v. United States, 235 U. S. 412, 416. And see Red Jacket, Jr., Coal Co. v. United Thacker Coal Co., 248 U. S. 531.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cheatham Electric Switching Device Co. v. Transit Development Co., 252 U.S. 567, 40 S. Ct. 343 (1920).
252 U.S. 567 (Cheatham Electric Switching Device Co. v. Transit Development Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Aspen Mining & Smelting Co. v. Billings
150 U.S. 31 (Supreme Court, 1893)
Brown v. Alton Water Co.
222 U.S. 325 (Supreme Court, 1912)
Metropolitan Water Co. v. Kaw Valley Drainage District
223 U.S. 519 (Supreme Court, 1912)
Shapiro v. United States
235 U.S. 412 (Supreme Court, 1914)
Jacket v. United Thacker Coal Co.
248 U.S. 531 (Supreme Court, 1918)