Cheatam v. Family Dollar
This text of Cheatam v. Family Dollar (Cheatam v. Family Dollar) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Case: 25-40638 Document: 31-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/14/2026
United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit ____________ United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit No. 25-40638 Summary Calendar FILED ____________ April 14, 2026 Lyle W. Cayce Ethel D. Cheatam, Clerk
Plaintiff—Appellant,
versus
Family Dollar Store,
Defendant—Appellee. ______________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 1:24-CV-449 ______________________________
Before Jones, Duncan, and Douglas, Circuit Judges. Per Curiam: * Ethel D. Cheatam, proceeding pro se, appeals the district court’s dismissal of her civil action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Despite Cheatam’s assertions to the contrary, the district court did not err in dismissing her case for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. See 28 U.S.C.
_____________________ * This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5. Case: 25-40638 Document: 31-1 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/14/2026
No. 25-40638
§§ 1331, 1332; Borden v. Allstate Ins. Co., 589 F.3d 168, 172 (5th Cir. 2009); Fed. Recovery Servs., Inc. v. United States, 72 F.3d 447, 453 (5th Cir. 1995). AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Cheatam v. Family Dollar, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cheatam-v-family-dollar-ca5-2026.