Cheatam v. Family Dollar

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided April 14, 2026·No. 25-40638·Unpublished

Opinion

Case: 25-40638 Document: 31-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/14/2026

United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit ____________ United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit No. 25-40638 Summary Calendar FILED ____________ April 14, 2026 Lyle W. Cayce Ethel D. Cheatam, Clerk

Plaintiff—Appellant,

versus

Family Dollar Store,

Defendant—Appellee. ______________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 1:24-CV-449 ______________________________

Before Jones, Duncan, and Douglas, Circuit Judges. Per Curiam: * Ethel D. Cheatam, proceeding pro se, appeals the district court’s dismissal of her civil action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Despite Cheatam’s assertions to the contrary, the district court did not err in dismissing her case for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. See 28 U.S.C.

_____________________ * This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5. Case: 25-40638 Document: 31-1 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/14/2026

No. 25-40638

§§ 1331, 1332; Borden v. Allstate Ins. Co., 589 F.3d 168, 172 (5th Cir. 2009); Fed. Recovery Servs., Inc. v. United States, 72 F.3d 447, 453 (5th Cir. 1995). AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cheatam v. Family Dollar, (5th Cir. 2026).

Cheatam v. Family Dollar (Cheatam v. Family Dollar) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Federal Recovery Services, Inc. v. United States
72 F.3d 447 (Fifth Circuit, 1995)
Borden v. Allstate Insurance
589 F.3d 168 (Fifth Circuit, 2009)