Cheaney v. Indiana

Supreme Court

Cheaney v. Indiana

410 U.S. 991, 93 S. Ct. 1516

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedMarch 19, 1973

DocketNo. 72-6002

StatusPublished

Cited by13 cases

This text of 410 U.S. 991 (Cheaney v. Indiana) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cheaney v. Indiana, 410 U.S. 991, 93 S. Ct. 1516 (1973).

Pincite

Opinion

Sup. Ct. Ind. Certiorari denied for want of standing of petitioner. Doremus v. Board of Education of the Borough of Hawthorne, 342 U. S. 429. Mr. Justice Douglas would deny certiorari on grounds that petitioner, who was convicted of performing an abortion, is not a doctor and that the decisions of this Court in Roe v. Wade, ante, p. 113, and Doe v. Bolton, ante, p. 179, were confined to the condition, inter alia, that the abortion, if performed, be based on an appropriately safeguarded medical judgment.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sup. Ct. Ind. Certiorari denied for want of standing of petitioner. Doremus v. Board of Education of the Borough of Hawthorne, 342 U. S. 429. Mr. Justice Douglas would deny certiorari on grounds that petitioner, who was convicted of performing an abortion, is not a doctor and that the decisions of this Court in Roe v. Wade, ante, p. 113, and Doe v. Bolton, ante, p. 179, were confined to the condition, inter alia, that the abortion, if performed, be based on an appropriately safeguarded medical judgment.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

410 U.S. 991, 93 S. Ct. 1516, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cheaney-v-indiana-scotus-1973.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack