Chaz Anthony Phillip Jones v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedFebruary 27, 2019
Docket10-17-00317-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Chaz Anthony Phillip Jones v. State (Chaz Anthony Phillip Jones v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Chaz Anthony Phillip Jones v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2019).

Opinion

IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-17-00317-CR

CHAZ ANTHONY PHILLIP JONES, Appellant v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

From the 413th District Court Johnson County, Texas Trial Court No. F50789

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Chaz Anthony Phillip Jones pled guilty to one count of Aggravated Sexual Assault

of a Child and one count of Online Solicitation of a Minor. See TEX. PENAL CODE ANN. §§

22.021(a)(2)(B); 33.021(c) (West 2011 & 2016). He was sentenced to 45 years and 20 years

in prison, respectively.1 The trial court’s judgments are affirmed.

In one issue, Jones contends that his sentences are grossly disproportionate to the

1 Jones was also found guilty of possession of a controlled substance. The appeal of this offense was severed from this appeal and disposed of in another appellate case number, 10-19-00074-CR. respective offenses under the Eighth Amendment to the United States Constitution and

Article I, Section 13 of the Texas Constitution. See U.S. CONST. amend. VIII; see also TEX.

CONST. art. I, § 13. A disproportionate-sentence claim must be preserved for appellate

review. See TEX. R. APP. P. 33.1(a)(1); Rhoades v. State, 934 S.W.2d 113, 120 (Tex. Crim.

App. 1996); Noland v. State, 264 S.W.3d 144, 151 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2007, pet.

ref'd). At trial, Jones did not object to the imposed sentences. Further, Jones did not raise

a disproportionate-sentence claim in his motion for new trial or otherwise present a post-

trial objection to the imposed sentences. Thus, Jones’s complaint is not preserved, and

his sole issue is overruled.

Having overruled Jones’s sole issue on appeal, we affirm the trial court’s

judgments.

TOM GRAY Chief Justice

Before Chief Justice Gray, Justice Davis, and Justice Scoggins2 Affirmed Opinion delivered and filed February 27, 2019 Do not publish [CRPM]

2 The Honorable Al Scoggins, Senior Justice of the Tenth Court of Appeals, sitting by assignment of the Chief Justice of the Texas Supreme Court. See TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. §§ 74.003, 75.002, 75.003 (West 2013).

Jones v. State Page 2

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Noland v. State
264 S.W.3d 144 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2008)
Rhoades v. State
934 S.W.2d 113 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Chaz Anthony Phillip Jones v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chaz-anthony-phillip-jones-v-state-texapp-2019.