Chavoustie v. Stone Street Baptist Church of Chaumont

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Chavoustie v. Stone Street Baptist Church of Chaumont

163 A.D.2d 856

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 13, 1990

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 163 A.D.2d 856 (Chavoustie v. Stone Street Baptist Church of Chaumont) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Chavoustie v. Stone Street Baptist Church of Chaumont, 163 A.D.2d 856 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1990).

Pincite

Opinion

Case held, decision reserved, and matter remitted to Supreme Court for further proceedings, in accordance with the following memorandum: This is an appeal from a judgment of the trial court which sustained plaintiffs’ causes of action to the extent that they sought to compel the removal of a chain-link fence erected by defendants allegedly on plaintiffs’ property, sought a declaration that plaintiffs acquired title by adverse possession to property on which plaintiffs’ pool and garage encroached, and sought to recover damages. The trial court’s written decision outlines the trial proof, but fails to set forth the ultimate facts that it found to support its conclusions (see, CPLR 4213 [b]). Under the circumstances, the proper course is to remit for findings of fact (Mastin v Village of Lima, 77 AD2d 786; Nutone Inc. v Bouley Co., 38 AD2d 670). (Appeal from order of Supreme Court, Jefferson County, Gilbert, J.—adverse possession.) Present— Callahan, J. P., Denman, Green, Balio and Lowery, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Case held, decision reserved, and matter remitted to Supreme Court for further proceedings, in accordance with the following memorandum: This is an appeal from a judgment of the trial court which sustained plaintiffs’ causes of action to the extent that they sought to compel the removal of a chain-link fence erected by defendants allegedly on plaintiffs’ property, sought a declaration that plaintiffs acquired title by adverse possession to property on which plaintiffs’ pool and garage encroached, and sought to recover damages. The trial court’s written decision outlines the trial proof, but fails to set forth the ultimate facts that it found to support its conclusions (see, CPLR 4213 [b]). Under the circumstances, the proper course is to remit for findings of fact (Mastin v Village of Lima, 77 AD2d 786; Nutone Inc. v Bouley Co., 38 AD2d 670). (Appeal from order of Supreme Court, Jefferson County, Gilbert, J.—adverse possession.) Present— Callahan, J. P., Denman, Green, Balio and Lowery, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

163 A.D.2d 856, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chavoustie-v-stone-street-baptist-church-of-chaumont-nyappdiv-1990.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack