Chavis v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Chavis v. State

475 So. 2d 300, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2187, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 15868

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedSeptember 18, 1985

DocketNo. 85-1514

StatusPublished

This text of 475 So. 2d 300 (Chavis v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Chavis v. State, 475 So. 2d 300, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2187, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 15868 (Fla. Ct. App. 1985).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We reverse the trial court’s order denying the petitioner’s claim for relief under Rule 3.850, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure.

The successor trial judge has reviewed the record. In accordance with his acknowledgment that the probationary period of defendant’s sentence is inappropriate, we remand with directions to the trial court to strike the probationary portion of defendant’s sentence.

REVERSED AND REMANDED WITH DIRECTIONS.

LETTS, GLICKSTEIN and BARKETT, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We reverse the trial court’s order denying the petitioner’s claim for relief under Rule 3.850, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure.

The successor trial judge has reviewed the record. In accordance with his acknowledgment that the probationary period of defendant’s sentence is inappropriate, we remand with directions to the trial court to strike the probationary portion of defendant’s sentence.

REVERSED AND REMANDED WITH DIRECTIONS.

LETTS, GLICKSTEIN and BARKETT, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

475 So. 2d 300, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2187, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 15868, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chavis-v-state-fladistctapp-1985.