Chavis v. Sibille
153 So. 3d 1155, 13 La.App. 3 Cir. 1016, 2014 WL 657513, 2014 La. App. LEXIS 351
Opinion
| jFor the foregoing reasons discussed in the consolidated case of Ronald Brooks v. Dr. John Scott Sibille, et al., 13-1015 (La.App. 3 Cir. 2/12/14), 153 So.3d 1121, 2014 WL 551562, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed. Costs of the appeal are assessed to the appellants, Robert Brooks and Jennifer Chavis.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Chavis v. Sibille, 153 So. 3d 1155, 13 La.App. 3 Cir. 1016, 2014 WL 657513, 2014 La. App. LEXIS 351 (La. Ct. App. 2014).
153 So. 3d 1155 (Chavis v. Sibille) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Brooks v. Sibille
153 So. 3d 1121 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2014)