Chavis v. Sibille
153 So. 3d 1155, 13 La.App. 3 Cir. 1016, 2014 WL 657513, 2014 La. App. LEXIS 351
This text of 153 So. 3d 1155 (Chavis v. Sibille) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Chavis v. Sibille, 153 So. 3d 1155, 13 La.App. 3 Cir. 1016, 2014 WL 657513, 2014 La. App. LEXIS 351 (La. Ct. App. 2014).
Opinion
| jFor the foregoing reasons discussed in the consolidated case of Ronald Brooks v. Dr. John Scott Sibille, et al., 13-1015 (La.App. 3 Cir. 2/12/14), 153 So.3d 1121, 2014 WL 551562, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed. Costs of the appeal are assessed to the appellants, Robert Brooks and Jennifer Chavis.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Brooks v. Sibille
153 So. 3d 1121 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2014)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
153 So. 3d 1155, 13 La.App. 3 Cir. 1016, 2014 WL 657513, 2014 La. App. LEXIS 351, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chavis-v-sibille-lactapp-2014.