Chavis v. Garcia
This text of Chavis v. Garcia (Chavis v. Garcia) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
REGINALD CHAVIS, No. 01-17072 Petitioner-Appellant, D.C. No. v. CV-00-02496- MIKE EVANS, Acting Warden, WBS/GGH Eastern District Respondent-Appellee. of California, Sacramento
ORDER
Filed April 25, 2006
Before: Betty B. Fletcher, Stephen S. Trott, and Raymond C. Fisher, Circuit Judges.
ORDER
Appellant’s motion to file supplemental briefs is DENIED. The judgment of the district court is reinstated.
4587 PRINTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE—U.S. COURTS BY THOMSON/WEST—SAN FRANCISCO
The summary, which does not constitute a part of the opinion of the court, is copyrighted © 2006 Thomson/West.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Chavis v. Garcia, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chavis-v-garcia-ca9-2006.