Chavis v. AVX Corporation

CourtCourt of Appeals of South Carolina
DecidedJune 4, 2014
Docket2014-UP-212
StatusUnpublished

This text of Chavis v. AVX Corporation (Chavis v. AVX Corporation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Chavis v. AVX Corporation, (S.C. Ct. App. 2014).

Opinion

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals

Gilbert Chavis, Employee,

v.

AVX Corporation, Employer, and Liberty Mutual Insurance, Carrier,

In Re: AVX Corporation and Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, Respondents,

South Carolina Second Injury Fund, Appellant.

Appellate Case No. 2012-213175

Appeal From Horry County Benjamin H. Culbertson, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2014-UP-212 Heard January 14, 2014 – Filed June 4, 2014

AFFIRMED

Latonya Dilligard Edwards, of Dilligard Edwards, LLC, of Columbia, for Appellant. Roy Allen Howell, III, and Kirsten Leslie Barr, both of Trask & Howell, LLC, of Mt. Pleasant, for Respondents.

PER CURIAM: The South Carolina Second Injury Fund (the "Fund") appeals the circuit court's decision to affirm the South Carolina Worker's Compensation Commission's (the "Commission") decision that AVX Corporation and Liberty Mutual Insurance (collectively, "AVX") timely commenced a claim for reimbursement within the ten-year statute of limitations provided by section 15-3- 600 of the South Carolina Code (Supp. 2013). We affirm.

We find AVX timely commenced its claim for reimbursement within the ten-year statute of limitations. Under section 42-9-400 of the South Carolina Code (Supp. 2013), as soon as practicable, an "employer or [its] carrier must notify the [Commission] and the Director of the [Fund] in writing of any possible claim against the [F]und" and provide certain basic information about the potential claim for reimbursement. § 42-9-400(f). An action for reimbursement "must be commenced within ten years" after the carrier provides notice pursuant to section 42-9-400. See § 15-3-600 ("An action for relief not provided for in this chapter must be commenced within ten years after the cause of action shall have accrued."); Transp. Ins. Co. & Flagstar Corp. v. S.C. Second Injury Fund, 389 S.C. 422, 430-31, 699 S.E.2d 687, 691 (2010) ("[A] cause of action for reimbursement begins to accrue on the date a carrier provides notice to the Fund [pursuant to section 42-9-400].").

In the instant case, AVX provided notice to the Fund pursuant to section 42-9-400 in August 1999. AVX submitted its claim to the Fund in July 2009, within the ten- year statute of limitations. "Once a claim is submitted, the Fund may agree to reimburse an employer or carrier." S.C. Second Injury Fund v. Am. Yard Prods., 330 S.C. 20, 23 n.1, 496 S.E.2d 862, 863 n.1 (1998). "If the Fund denies a claim for reimbursement, [then] the employer or carrier may request a hearing before the Commission on the claim." Id. (citing 25A S.C. Code Ann. Reg. 67-208(D) (1990)). Accordingly, we agree with the Commission's interpretation that filing a claim with the Fund constitutes commencing an action for reimbursement. See CFRE, LLC v. Greenville Cnty. Assessor, 395 S.C. 67, 77, 716 S.E.2d 877, 882 (2011) ("The construction of a statute by the agency charged with its administration will be accorded the most respectful consideration and will not be overruled absent compelling reasons." (internal quotation marks omitted)). AFFIRMED.

SHORT, WILLIAMS, and KONDUROS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

South Carolina Second Injury Fund v. American Yard Products
496 S.E.2d 862 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1998)
Transportation Insurance v. South Carolina Second Injury Fund
699 S.E.2d 687 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 2010)
CFRE, LLC v. Greenville County Assessor
716 S.E.2d 877 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Chavis v. AVX Corporation, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chavis-v-avx-corporation-scctapp-2014.