Chavez v. Wong
This text of Chavez v. Wong (Chavez v. Wong) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCPW-XX-XXXXXXX 18-MAY-2022 08:44 AM Dkt. 7 ODDP
SCPW-XX-XXXXXXX
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I
LEONARDO R. CHAVEZ, Petitioner,
vs.
THE HONORABLE PAUL B.K. WONG, Judge of the Circuit Court of the First Circuit, State of Hawai#i, Respondent Judge.
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING (CASE NO. 1PC141000360)
ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Wilson, and Eddins, JJ.)
Upon consideration of petitioner Leonardo R. Chavez’s
petition for writ of mandamus, filed on April 29, 2022, and the
record, petitioner is currently seeking identical relief in the
circuit court. Rule 44A of the Hawai#i Rules of Penal Procedure
and Rule 23 of the Rules of the Circuit Courts of the State of
Hawai#i require the prevailing party to prepare findings of fact,
conclusions of law, and order within 10 days of the circuit
court’s decision or ruling, and petitioner’s pending “Motion for
Entry of Order,” filed in the circuit court on March 29, 2022, requests findings of fact, conclusions of law, and order be filed
in connection with several motions that have been ruled upon in
favor of the State of Hawai#i. An extraordinary writ is thus not
warranted at this time. See Kema v. Gaddis, 91 Hawai#i 200, 204,
982 P.2d 334, 338 (1999) (explaining that a writ of mandamus is
an extraordinary remedy that will not issue unless the petitioner
demonstrates a clear and indisputable right to relief and a lack
of alternative means to redress adequately the alleged wrong or
obtain the requested action; such a writ is meant to restrain a
judge who has exceeded the judge’s jurisdiction, has committed a
flagrant and manifest abuse of discretion, or has refused to act
on a subject properly before the court under circumstances in
which the judge has a legal duty to act). Accordingly,
It is ordered that the petition for writ of mandamus is
denied.
DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, May 18, 2022.
/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald
/s/ Paula A. Nakayama
/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna
/s/ Michael D. Wilson
/s/ Todd W. Eddins
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Chavez v. Wong, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chavez-v-wong-haw-2022.