Chavez v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Chavez v. State

237 S.W.3d 243, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1488, 2007 WL 3145919

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided October 30, 2007·No. No. ED 89093·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Elizes Chavez (Movant) appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 24.035¹ motion after an evidentiary hearing. On appeal, Movant argues that the motion court erred in denying his motion because his counsel erroneously advised him about the amount of time he would serve.

The motion court’s findings and conclusions are not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision. The judgment is affirmed. Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Elizes Chavez (Movant) appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 24.035¹ motion after an evidentiary hearing. On appeal, Movant argues that the motion court erred in denying his motion because his counsel erroneously advised him about the amount of time he would serve.

The motion court’s findings and conclusions are not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision. The judgment is affirmed. Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

Footnotes

Chavez v. State, 237 S.W.3d 243, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1488, 2007 WL 3145919 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007).

Pincite

237 S.W.3d 243 (Chavez v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.