Chavez v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Chavez v. State

22 So. 3d 683, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 16353, 2009 WL 3616612

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedNovember 4, 2009

Docket3D09-2597

StatusPublished

This text of 22 So. 3d 683 (Chavez v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Chavez v. State, 22 So. 3d 683, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 16353, 2009 WL 3616612 (Fla. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal of an order summarily denying a motion for postconviction relief under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800. Defendant-appellant Hector Chavez entered into a negotiated plea and was sentenced to ten years in prison followed by eight years of probation followed by two years of community control. The written sentencing order specifies “no credit time served per court.” Defendant-appellant alleges that he is entitled to credit for five hundred sixty-four days served in county jail prior to sentencing. The postconviction record now before us does not contain the plea colloquy or the written plea agreement.

On appeal from an order summarily denying a motion for postconviction relief, this court is required to reverse unless the postconviction record conclusively shows that the defendant is not entitled to any relief. Fla. RApp. P. 9.141(b)(2)(D). We therefore reverse the order now before us *684 and remand for further proceedings. If the trial court again denies relief, it shall attach record excerpts conclusively showing that the defendant is not entitled to any relief.

Reversed and remanded for further proceedings consistent herewith.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal of an order summarily denying a motion for postconviction relief under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800. Defendant-appellant Hector Chavez entered into a negotiated plea and was sentenced to ten years in prison followed by eight years of probation followed by two years of community control. The written sentencing order specifies “no credit time served per court.” Defendant-appellant alleges that he is entitled to credit for five hundred sixty-four days served in county jail prior to sentencing. The postconviction record now before us does not contain the plea colloquy or the written plea agreement.

On appeal from an order summarily denying a motion for postconviction relief, this court is required to reverse unless the postconviction record conclusively shows that the defendant is not entitled to any relief. Fla. RApp. P. 9.141(b)(2)(D). We therefore reverse the order now before us *684 and remand for further proceedings. If the trial court again denies relief, it shall attach record excerpts conclusively showing that the defendant is not entitled to any relief.

Reversed and remanded for further proceedings consistent herewith.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

22 So. 3d 683, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 16353, 2009 WL 3616612, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chavez-v-state-fladistctapp-2009.