Chavez v. Errico

255 A.D.2d 353, 679 N.Y.S.2d 843, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11817
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 9, 1998·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (O’Connell, J.), entered November 14, 1997, which, after a hearing, denied their motion, inter alia, to vacate their default in appearing and answering the compláint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Parties attempting to vacate a default in appearing in an action and answering must establish both a reasonable excuse for the default and a meritorious defense (see, Roussodimou v Zafiriadis, 238 AD2d 568; Fennell v Mason, 204 AD2d 599; Putney v Pearlman, 203 AD2d 333). The defendants have failed to satisfy that standard in this case. Bracken, J. P., Ritter, Copertino, Santucci and Altman, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Chavez v. Errico, 255 A.D.2d 353, 679 N.Y.S.2d 843, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11817 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

255 A.D.2d 353 (Chavez v. Errico) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Warren v. Allstate Insurance
300 A.D.2d 577 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)
Loria v. Plesser
267 A.D.2d 213 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)
Neuman v. Greenblatt
260 A.D.2d 616 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)