Chavez v. Alderman

21 F. App'x 237
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided November 15, 2001·No. 01-6737·Unpublished·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Roberto Chavez appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp.2001) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Chavez’s motion for appointment of counsel and affirm on the reasoning of the *238 district court. See Chavez v. Alderman, No. CA-99-1550-AM (E.D. Va. filed Mar. 27, 2001; entered Apr. 2, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Chavez v. Alderman, 21 F. App'x 237 (4th Cir. 2001).

21 F. App'x 237 (Chavez v. Alderman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related