Chavez v. Aetna Finance Company
561 S.W.2d 799
Opinion
The judgment of the court of civil appeals, 558 S.W.2d 174, in remanding the cause for new trial is correct, and accordingly we refuse the application for writ of error, no reversible error.
The applicability of the so-called Rule of 78ths, Tex.Rev.Civ.Stat.Ann. art. 5069-3.-15(6), to the situation of default and acceleration was not directly considered by the lower courts. We express no opinion as to its applicability in the event the question is raised in the second trial.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Chavez v. Aetna Finance Company, 561 S.W.2d 799 (Tex. 1978).
561 S.W.2d 799 (Chavez v. Aetna Finance Company) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Everett J. Flesher and Rita Flesher v. Household Finance Corporation of Ohio
640 F.2d 861 (Sixth Circuit, 1981)
Zemaco, Inc. v. Navarro
580 S.W.2d 616 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1979)