Chavez v. Aetna Finance Company

Texas Supreme Court

Chavez v. Aetna Finance Company

561 S.W.2d 799

CourtTexas Supreme Court

DecidedJanuary 4, 1978

DocketNo. B-6994

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 561 S.W.2d 799 (Chavez v. Aetna Finance Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Chavez v. Aetna Finance Company, 561 S.W.2d 799 (Tex. 1978).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The judgment of the court of civil appeals, 558 S.W.2d 174, in remanding the cause for new trial is correct, and accordingly we refuse the application for writ of error, no reversible error.

The applicability of the so-called Rule of 78ths, Tex.Rev.Civ.Stat.Ann. art. 5069-3.-15(6), to the situation of default and acceleration was not directly considered by the lower courts. We express no opinion as to its applicability in the event the question is raised in the second trial.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The judgment of the court of civil appeals, 558 S.W.2d 174, in remanding the cause for new trial is correct, and accordingly we refuse the application for writ of error, no reversible error.

The applicability of the so-called Rule of 78ths, Tex.Rev.Civ.Stat.Ann. art. 5069-3.-15(6), to the situation of default and acceleration was not directly considered by the lower courts. We express no opinion as to its applicability in the event the question is raised in the second trial.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

561 S.W.2d 799, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chavez-v-aetna-finance-company-tex-1978.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack