Chaves v. State

275 S.W. 1006, 101 Tex. Crim. 367, 1925 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 803
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedFebruary 18, 1925
DocketNo. 8650.
StatusPublished
Cited by14 cases

This text of 275 S.W. 1006 (Chaves v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Chaves v. State, 275 S.W. 1006, 101 Tex. Crim. 367, 1925 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 803 (Tex. 1925).

Opinions

Appellant was convicted in the district court of Reeves county of possessing intoxicating liquor, and his punishment fixed at one year in the penitentiary. *Page 368

The appeal bond is not signed by appellant. His name is signed thereto by his attorney of record. No attempt of any kind is made to show authority on the part of said attorney for such signature, even if it were permitted under Art. 321 of our C. C. P. which requires that such recognizance or bond shall be signed by the accused. This is also the effect of the decisions which are collated under said article in Mr. Vernon's C. C. P. See Chaney v. State, 23 Tex. 24; Ferrill v. State, 29 Tex. 489 [29 Tex. 489]. We further observe that appellant was tried in December 1923, and his bond is dated and approved in January 1923. We also note that the description of the offense in said bond is insufficient. "Possession of 1 qt. of liquor for sale" is not the equivalent for "Possession of intoxicating liquor for the purpose of sale."

For the insufficience of the bond the appeal will be dismissed.

Appeal Dismissed.

ON MOTION TO RE-INSTATE APPEAL.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Fuller v. State
48 S.W.2d 303 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1932)
Reeves v. State
47 S.W.2d 309 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1931)
Martin v. State
38 S.W.2d 791 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1931)
Spencer v. State
42 S.W.2d 259 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1930)
Bracken v. State
12 S.W.2d 209 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1928)
Jackson v. State
5 S.W.2d 989 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1928)
Williams v. State
292 S.W. 898 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1927)
Eubank v. State
286 S.W. 234 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1926)
Henson Pettigrew v. State
280 S.W. 592 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1926)
Lloyd v. State
279 S.W. 843 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1925)
Trammel v. State
279 S.W. 277 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1925)
Trammell v. State
279 S.W. 277 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1925)
Riojas v. State
277 S.W. 696 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1925)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
275 S.W. 1006, 101 Tex. Crim. 367, 1925 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 803, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chaves-v-state-texcrimapp-1925.