Chaves v. State
This text of 275 S.W. 1006 (Chaves v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
Appellant was convicted in the district court of Reeves county of possessing intoxicating liquor, and his punishment fixed at one year in the penitentiary. *Page 368
The appeal bond is not signed by appellant. His name is signed thereto by his attorney of record. No attempt of any kind is made to show authority on the part of said attorney for such signature, even if it were permitted under Art. 321 of our C. C. P. which requires that such recognizance or bond shall be signed by the accused. This is also the effect of the decisions which are collated under said article in Mr. Vernon's C. C. P. See Chaney v. State,
For the insufficience of the bond the appeal will be dismissed.
Appeal Dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
275 S.W. 1006, 101 Tex. Crim. 367, 1925 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 803, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chaves-v-state-texcrimapp-1925.