Chavers v. Grant

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Chavers v. Grant

307 A.D.2d 311, 762 N.Y.S.2d 807

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 21, 2003

StatusPublished

This text of 307 A.D.2d 311 (Chavers v. Grant) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Chavers v. Grant, 307 A.D.2d 311, 762 N.Y.S.2d 807 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

In a child support proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 4, the mother appeals from an order of the Family Court, Kings County (Hepner, J.), dated January 7, 2002, which denied her objections to an order of the same court (Shamahs, H.E.), dated August 24, 2001, which directed the Support Collection Unit to refund to the father a sum of money representing overpayments of child support.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The Family Court properly denied the mother’s objections to the order dated August 24, 2001, directing the Support Collection Unit to refund to the father a sum of money representing overpayments of child support.

The mother’s remaining contentions are without merit. Prudenti, P.J., Altman, Smith and Adams, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a child support proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 4, the mother appeals from an order of the Family Court, Kings County (Hepner, J.), dated January 7, 2002, which denied her objections to an order of the same court (Shamahs, H.E.), dated August 24, 2001, which directed the Support Collection Unit to refund to the father a sum of money representing overpayments of child support.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The Family Court properly denied the mother’s objections to the order dated August 24, 2001, directing the Support Collection Unit to refund to the father a sum of money representing overpayments of child support.

The mother’s remaining contentions are without merit. Prudenti, P.J., Altman, Smith and Adams, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

307 A.D.2d 311, 762 N.Y.S.2d 807, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chavers-v-grant-nyappdiv-2003.