Chaverra v. Hollie

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Chaverra v. Hollie

290 A.D.2d 439, 736 N.Y.S.2d 243, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 279

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 14, 2002

StatusPublished

This text of 290 A.D.2d 439 (Chaverra v. Hollie) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Chaverra v. Hollie, 290 A.D.2d 439, 736 N.Y.S.2d 243, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 279 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 in the nature of mandamus, inter alia, to compel the respondent, a Justice of the Supreme Court, Queens County, to decide the petitioner’s pretrial motion to dismiss the indictment in an action entitled People v Chaverra, which was pending under Queens County Indictment No. 11190/99, and application by the petitioner to prosecute the proceeding as a poor person.

Ordered that the application is granted to the extent that [440]*440the filing fee imposed by CPLR 8022 (b) is waived, and the application is otherwise denied as academic; and it is further,

Adjudged that the petition is denied and the proceeding is dismissed as academic, without costs or disbursements.

In the underlying case, by judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, rendered November 8, 2001, the petitioner was convicted, inter alia, of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and sentence was imposed. Accordingly, the proceeding is dismissed as academic. Santucci, J.P., Adams, Crane and Cozier, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 in the nature of mandamus, inter alia, to compel the respondent, a Justice of the Supreme Court, Queens County, to decide the petitioner’s pretrial motion to dismiss the indictment in an action entitled People v Chaverra, which was pending under Queens County Indictment No. 11190/99, and application by the petitioner to prosecute the proceeding as a poor person.

Ordered that the application is granted to the extent that [440]*440the filing fee imposed by CPLR 8022 (b) is waived, and the application is otherwise denied as academic; and it is further,

Adjudged that the petition is denied and the proceeding is dismissed as academic, without costs or disbursements.

In the underlying case, by judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, rendered November 8, 2001, the petitioner was convicted, inter alia, of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and sentence was imposed. Accordingly, the proceeding is dismissed as academic. Santucci, J.P., Adams, Crane and Cozier, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

290 A.D.2d 439, 736 N.Y.S.2d 243, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 279, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chaverra-v-hollie-nyappdiv-2002.