Chauvin v. Shell Oil Co.

214 So. 3d 855, 2017 WL 1199653, 2017 La. LEXIS 651
CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana
DecidedMarch 31, 2017
DocketNO. 2017-OC-43
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 214 So. 3d 855 (Chauvin v. Shell Oil Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Chauvin v. Shell Oil Co., 214 So. 3d 855, 2017 WL 1199653, 2017 La. LEXIS 651 (La. 2017).

Opinions

PER CURIAM

L La. Code of Civil Proc. Article 1974 provides:

The delay for applying for a new trial shall be seven days, exclusive of legal holidays. The delay for applying for a new trial commences to run on the day after the clerk has mailed, or the sheriff has served, the notice of judgment as required by Article 1913.

(Emphasis added.)

This statute specifically addresses the procedure for applying for a new trial. Plaintiffs timely filed a motion for new trial based on the date notice of judgment was served by the sheriff. This request for a new trial was timely, as was the subsequent devolutive appeal.

Appeals are favored under the law. Shell Pipeline Corp. v. Kennedy, 2000-3207 (La. 10/16/01), 799 So.2d 475, 478. Plaintiffs’ appeal is reinstated and the matter is remanded to the court of appeal for consideration on the merits.

CLARK, J., dissents and would deny the writ application. CRICHTON, J., would deny.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Sarah Ackerman Gilberti v. Eric P. Gilberti
Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2022

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
214 So. 3d 855, 2017 WL 1199653, 2017 La. LEXIS 651, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chauvin-v-shell-oil-co-la-2017.