Chautauqua Investment Co. v. Town of Chautauqua

84 A.D.2d 959, 446 N.Y.S.2d 724, 1981 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16235
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedNovember 13, 1981
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 84 A.D.2d 959 (Chautauqua Investment Co. v. Town of Chautauqua) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Chautauqua Investment Co. v. Town of Chautauqua, 84 A.D.2d 959, 446 N.Y.S.2d 724, 1981 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16235 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1981).

Opinion

Judgment unanimously modified and, as modified, affirmed, without costs, in accordance with the following memorandum: Defendant town appeals from a judgment declaring the Town of Chautauqua zoning ordinance ineffective to prohibit the use of plaintiff’s property as a commercial campground. Plaintiff purchased the property near Chautauqua Lake on October 28] 1977 from the Bethany Fellowship of Independent Baptist Churches, Inc., for use as a commercial campground to accommodate up to 200 temporary residences or trailer sites. On the property at the time of purchase [960]*960were one main building, nine smaller buildings and a cottage which had been used as a nonprofit summer youth facility and a family religious camp. On December 27,1977 a. zoning ordinance was adopted which placed the property in the residential-lakeside (R-L) district, a zone in which the commercial campground use would be prohibited. There is uncontradicted evidence that plaintiff was aware prior to the purchase of the effect that the proposed zoning ordinance would have upon the property. Although plaintiff made repairs and improvements to the existing summer camp buildings prior to the adoption of the ordinance, there is no evidence that the property was on that date or at any other time in use as a commercial campground for temporary residences or trailers. Thus, there was no’ legal nonconforming use as a commercial campground and the court’s contrary holding was in error. Accordingly, the first decretal paragraph of the judgment is modified so as to declare that the zoning ordinance prohibits the contemplated use of the property in accordance with the New York State Health Department permit as a commercial campground for temporary residences and trailers. The second decretal paragraph is stricken. (Appeal from judgment of Chautauqua Supreme Court, Cass, J. — declaratory judgment.) Present — Hancock, Jr., J. P., Callahan, Doerr, Den-man and Schnepp, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Chautauqua Investment Co. v. Town of Chautauqua
437 N.E.2d 284 (New York Court of Appeals, 1982)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
84 A.D.2d 959, 446 N.Y.S.2d 724, 1981 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16235, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chautauqua-investment-co-v-town-of-chautauqua-nyappdiv-1981.