Chauncey v. Taylor

Indiana Supreme Court

Chauncey v. Taylor

83 Ind. 598

CourtIndiana Supreme Court

DecidedMay 15, 1882

DocketNo. 7832

StatusPublished

This text of 83 Ind. 598 (Chauncey v. Taylor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Chauncey v. Taylor, 83 Ind. 598 (Ind. 1882).

Pincite

Opinion

Howk, J.

It is conceded by the counsel of the respective parties that the questions presented for the decision of this court, by the record of this cause and the errors assigned thereon, are substantially the same as those which were carefully considered and decided at the last term, in the case of Nash v. Taylor, ante, p. 347. For the reasons givenin the opinion of Elliott, C. J., in the case cited, and upon its authority, the case at bar must he decided as that cause was decided.

The judgment is affirmed, at the appellants’ costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Howk, J.

It is conceded by the counsel of the respective parties that the questions presented for the decision of this court, by the record of this cause and the errors assigned thereon, are substantially the same as those which were carefully considered and decided at the last term, in the case of Nash v. Taylor, ante, p. 347. For the reasons givenin the opinion of Elliott, C. J., in the case cited, and upon its authority, the case at bar must he decided as that cause was decided.

The judgment is affirmed, at the appellants’ costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

83 Ind. 598, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chauncey-v-taylor-ind-1882.