Chauncey Middleton v. State
This text of Chauncey Middleton v. State (Chauncey Middleton v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion issued January 15, 2009
In The
Court of Appeals
For The
First District of Texas
NO. 01–08–00259–CV
CHAUNCEY MIDDLETON, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the 280th District Court
Harris County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. 2006-71921
MEMORANDUM OPINIONAppellant Chauncey Middleton has failed to timely file a brief. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a) (failure of appellant to file brief). After being notified that this appeal was subject to dismissal, appellant did not adequately respond. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b) (allowing involuntary dismissal of case).
The appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution for failure to timely file a brief. All pending motions are denied.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Taft, Bland, and Sharp.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Chauncey Middleton v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chauncey-middleton-v-state-texapp-2009.