Chau Thanh Vuong and Thu Nguyen Vuong v. Phu the Troung and Mai Troung, Individually and on Behalf of Chauvin Farm

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedMarch 30, 2006
Docket14-06-00111-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Chau Thanh Vuong and Thu Nguyen Vuong v. Phu the Troung and Mai Troung, Individually and on Behalf of Chauvin Farm (Chau Thanh Vuong and Thu Nguyen Vuong v. Phu the Troung and Mai Troung, Individually and on Behalf of Chauvin Farm) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Chau Thanh Vuong and Thu Nguyen Vuong v. Phu the Troung and Mai Troung, Individually and on Behalf of Chauvin Farm, (Tex. Ct. App. 2006).

Opinion

Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed March 30, 2006

Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed March 30, 2006.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-06-00111-CV

CHAU THANH VUONG AND THU NGUYEN VUONG, Appellants

V.

PHU THE TROUNG AND MAI TROUNG, INDIVIDUALLY AND

ON BEHALF OF CHAUVIN FARM, Appellee

On Appeal from the 269th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 00-61957

M E M O R A N D U M  O P I N I O N

This is an appeal from a judgment signed May 6, 2005.  The notice of appeal was filed on June 6, 2005.  To date, our records show that appellant has neither established indigence nor  paid the $125.00 appellate filing fee.  See Tex. R. App. P. 5 (requiring payment of fees in civil cases unless indigent); Tex. R. App. P. 20.1 (listing requirements for establishing indigence); see also Order Regarding Fees Charged in Civil Cases in the Supreme Court and the Courts of Appeals, Misc. Docket No. 98-9120 (Tex. Jul. 21, 1998) (listing fees in court of appeals); Tex. Gov=t Code Ann. ' 51.207 (Vernon 2005) (same).


After being given the requisite ten-days= notice that this appeal was subject to dismissal, appellant did not respond.  See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3.  Accordingly, the appeal is ordered dismissed.  See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c) (allowing involuntary dismissal of case because appellant has failed to comply with notice from clerk requiring response or other action within specified time). 

PER CURIAM

Judgment rendered and Memorandum Opinion filed March 30, 2006.

Panel consists of Justices Hudson, Fowler, and Seymore.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Chau Thanh Vuong and Thu Nguyen Vuong v. Phu the Troung and Mai Troung, Individually and on Behalf of Chauvin Farm, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chau-thanh-vuong-and-thu-nguyen-vuong-v-phu-the-tr-texapp-2006.