Chattin v. Chattin

488 So. 2d 643, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1159, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 7841
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 14, 1986·No. No. 85-1830·Published

Opinion

SANDERLIN, Judge.

In this appeal the wife challenges an order of the trial court which granted the husband’s motion for modification of final judgment of dissolution of marriage, and which required the wife to pay $60.20 per month per child in child support. We reverse.

In its order, the trial court found that the wife’s income had increased from zero, at the time the final judgment of dissolution was entered, to $836.67, at the time modification was sought, and that this was a significant change requiring her to contribute to child support in the form of monthly payments of $60.20 for each child. While the wife’s income may have increased since the time dissolution was granted, the trial court made no finding that this increase in income also evidenced an increased ability to pay child support. The record before us clearly reflects that while the wife’s income may have increased, so too have her expenses to the extent that her monthly expenses exceed her income by more than $400. Because there is no competent substantial evidence of the wife’s increased ability to pay child support, the trial court’s order is reversed. See Diaco v. Diaco, 363 So.2d 183 (Fla. 2d DCA 1978). The husband, of course, can file a new motion for any necessary assistance in meeting the needs of the children, if and when the wife’s financial situation improves. See Scheuter v. Scheuter, 408 So.2d 612 (Fla. 2d DCA 1982).

SCHEB, A.C.J., and HALL, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Chattin v. Chattin, 488 So. 2d 643, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1159, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 7841 (Fla. Ct. App. 1986).

488 So. 2d 643 (Chattin v. Chattin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Diaco v. Diaco
363 So. 2d 183 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1978)