Chatterton v. Kreitler

New York Supreme Court

Chatterton v. Kreitler

2 Abb. N. Cas. 453

CourtNew York Supreme Court

DecidedNovember 15, 1877

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 2 Abb. N. Cas. 453 (Chatterton v. Kreitler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Chatterton v. Kreitler, 2 Abb. N. Cas. 453 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1877).

Pincite

Opinion

Lawrence, J.

I am not prepared to hold that section 603 of the Code of Civil Procedure dispenses with the necessity of an affidavit upon an application for an injunction. If it does not, the verification of the complaint is not sufficient.

Section 603 must be read in connection with section 607 (See also Mr. Throop’s note to § 603). For this reason the motion for an injunction is denied, but, as the point is new, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lawrence, J.

I am not prepared to hold that section 603 of the Code of Civil Procedure dispenses with the necessity of an affidavit upon an application for an injunction. If it does not, the verification of the complaint is not sufficient.

Section 603 must be read in connection with section 607 (See also Mr. Throop’s note to § 603). For this reason the motion for an injunction is denied, but, as the point is new, without costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2 Abb. N. Cas. 453, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chatterton-v-kreitler-nysupct-1877.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack