Chattanooga Pottery Co. v. Tatum Naval Stores Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Chattanooga Pottery Co. v. Tatum Naval Stores Co.

66 S.E. 479, 7 Ga. App. 179, 1909 Ga. App. LEXIS 575

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedDecember 10, 1909

Docket2063

StatusPublished

This text of 66 S.E. 479 (Chattanooga Pottery Co. v. Tatum Naval Stores Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Chattanooga Pottery Co. v. Tatum Naval Stores Co., 66 S.E. 479, 7 Ga. App. 179, 1909 Ga. App. LEXIS 575 (Ga. Ct. App. 1909).

Pincite

Opinion

Russell, J.

The verdict rendered was not demanded by the evidence; and und'er the facts disclosed by this record, there was no error in the first grant of a new trial, even though such new trial was granted by a judge other than he who presided at the trial of the cause.

Judgment affirmed.

Complaint; from city court of Sylvester — Judge Park. June 19, 1909.

Argued November 18, Decided December 10, 1909. Glande Payton, Pope & Bennet, for plaintiff in error. T. B. Perry, J. II. Tipton, J. B. Williams, W. E. Talley, contra..

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Russell, J.

The verdict rendered was not demanded by the evidence; and und'er the facts disclosed by this record, there was no error in the first grant of a new trial, even though such new trial was granted by a judge other than he who presided at the trial of the cause.

Judgment affirmed.

Complaint; from city court of Sylvester — Judge Park. June 19, 1909.

Argued November 18, Decided December 10, 1909. Glande Payton, Pope & Bennet, for plaintiff in error. T. B. Perry, J. II. Tipton, J. B. Williams, W. E. Talley, contra..

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

66 S.E. 479, 7 Ga. App. 179, 1909 Ga. App. LEXIS 575, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chattanooga-pottery-co-v-tatum-naval-stores-co-gactapp-1909.