Chatman v. McVey

Fourth Circuit

Chatman v. McVey

6 F. App'x 189

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided March 28, 2001·No. No. 00-7385·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Rodrick Bernard Chatman appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for civil or criminal contempt. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Chatman v. McVey, No. CA-95-1285-7 (W.D.Va. Sept 15, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Rodrick Bernard Chatman appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for civil or criminal contempt. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Chatman v. McVey, No. CA-95-1285-7 (W.D.Va. Sept 15, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Chatman v. McVey, 6 F. App'x 189 (4th Cir. 2001).

Pincite

6 F. App'x 189 (Chatman v. McVey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.